The Business & Technology Network
Helping Business Interpret and Use Technology
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 

Whale Watching in a Shallowing Pool: The Specter of Manipulation in Modern Crypto

DATE POSTED:October 14, 2025
Introduction: The Erosion of a Digital Utopia

The foundational promise of cryptocurrency was one of radical disintermediation. It was a vision of a level playing field, a global financial system governed by immutable code, free from the caprice and corruption of centralized institutions. For years, the greatest existential threats to this digital utopia were perceived as external and technological: sophisticated hacks, 51% attacks, and smart contract exploits. The industry’s collective fear was that the code itself might break.

Today, a far more insidious fear is taking root. It is the chilling realization that the code can be perfect, the network secure, and the system can still be fundamentally compromised. The threat has evolved from external attacks on the technology to internal manipulation by the players. The primary fear is no longer that the house will be robbed, but that the game itself is rigged.

The market crash of October 11, 2025, served as a brutal catalyst, exposing not just the market’s fragility but the unnerving precision with which certain powerful entities navigated the chaos. In the aftermath, on-chain data has painted a disturbing picture — not of panic, but of predation. Evidence is mounting that a small cabal of hyper-capitalized traders, or “whales,” did not merely survive the crash; they orchestrated and profited from it on an unprecedented scale.

This article will dissect the mounting evidence of coordinated market manipulation, drawing on on-chain data and investigative reports. It will explore the central thesis that crypto is becoming a “shallowing pool” — a market vast in nominal value but shallow in the distribution of power, making it dangerously susceptible to control. We will analyze the tools and techniques used by these apex predators and confront the ultimate question for the industry’s future: When the greatest threat is no longer a bug in the code but a conspiracy between a privileged few, where does crypto go from here?

1: The Data Trail — Anatomy of a Coordinated Strike

In the chaotic hours of the 10.11 crash, while millions of retail traders were liquidated, a select few were placing bets of extraordinary size and confidence. Their actions, immortalized on the blockchain, were not the reactive moves of skilled traders; they were the proactive strikes of entities operating with what appears to be a profound information advantage.

The “OG Whale” and the $492 Million Declaration of War

The most glaring signal came from a single, legendary Bitcoin OG whale. Hyperbot data revealed a position of breathtaking audacity: a 10x leveraged Bitcoin short position totaling $492,592,692. This was not a hedge or a speculative punt; it was a high-conviction declaration of war against the market’s prevailing sentiment.

The specifics of the trade are telling:

  • Entry Price: $115,288.4
  • Liquidation Price: $124,262.8
  • Reported Floating Profit: $14.19 million at the time of the report.

An entry price above $115,000 indicates this position was likely built or significantly added to before the geopolitical news catalyst broke and the panic began. For a trader to risk nearly half a billion dollars on a short, with a liquidation price just 7.7% above their entry, suggests a level of certainty that borders on precognition. In a market driven by narratives and sentiment, this whale was trading on something far more concrete. They were not predicting the storm; they appeared to be positioning their ship with the storm’s blueprint already in hand.

The Pod: A Market-Wide Assault

This was not the work of a lone actor. Data from the on-chain monitoring service Lookonchain revealed that this OG whale was part of a larger, coordinated pod operating on the decentralized derivatives platform Hyperliquid. Two other colossal players were identified executing a similar strategy, expanding the assault beyond Bitcoin to the entire altcoin market:

  • Whale 1 (Address 0x9eec9): This entity netted a staggering $31.8 million in profit from the crash. Even after the event, it held a portfolio of short positions worth $98 million, targeting a diverse range of assets including DOGE, ETH, PEPE, XRP, and ASTER. This demonstrates a strategic, market-wide bearish conviction, designed to profit from a systemic collapse rather than the failure of a single asset.
  • Whale 2 (Address 0x9263): This trader secured $13.2 million in profit and maintained active short positions worth $84 million, primarily focused on high-beta majors like SOL and BTC.

The collective footprint of these three entities alone represents hundreds of millions of dollars in leveraged bets, all perfectly timed to capitalize on the ensuing panic. The diversity of the assets targeted, the sheer scale of the capital deployed, and the use of a single platform for execution all point away from random chance and toward coordinated action. They were not just riding the wave; they were helping to create it. The data on-chain was screaming manipulation; the next step was to find the off-chain source.

2: The “Eye” Investigation — From On-Chain Clues to an Off-Chain Conspiracy

The digital breadcrumbs left by these whales led independent on-chain detective “Eye” down a rabbit hole that connected the volatile world of crypto derivatives to the highest echelons of political power. In a series of explosive posts, Eye outlined a theory that moved from market manipulation to full-blown insider trading, allegedly involving a network of well-connected individuals receiving non-public political intelligence.

The White House Connection

According to sources cited by Eye, the intelligence that fueled these billion-dollar trades was not derived from technical analysis or market sentiment. Instead, it was allegedly sourced from within the White House itself. The investigation suggested a shocking link:

  • The Information Leak: The core allegation is that aides close to the U.S. President’s team were leaking advance warnings of market-moving policy announcements — specifically, the threat of 100% tariffs on China — to a privileged group of traders.
  • The Inner Circle: This network was not composed of crypto-native tech figures. Eye’s investigation identified Zach Witkoff and Chase Herro as central figures in this alleged ring. More alarmingly, the report suggested that the former President’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., may have also been involved.
  • The Front Man: The investigation proposed that “Garret,” a figure previously associated with the group, was not the mastermind but a front man, designed to obscure the more powerful players operating in the shadows.

This theory, if true, represents a paradigm shift in understanding crypto market dynamics. It suggests that the most significant “alpha” (asymmetric information) in the space is no longer found by analyzing mempools or GitHub commits, but through old-fashioned political corruption. Crypto, in its bid for mainstream relevance, has seemingly imported one of the oldest and most destructive pathologies of traditional finance.

A Chilling Silence

The most disturbing element of Eye’s investigation was its conclusion. In a final post, the detective announced they would be ceasing all further reporting on the matter, citing concerns for their personal safety. They urged other investigative journalists to pick up the trail.

This act of self-censorship speaks volumes. It implies that the forces at play are not just wealthy but powerful and potentially dangerous. When on-chain investigators, who often thrive on exposing wrongdoing, are silenced by physical threats, it signals that the stakes have been raised to a terrifying new level. The conspiracy is not just a theory; it is a reality with real-world consequences for those who dare to expose it.

3: The Shallowing Pool — Is Crypto’s Decentralization a Myth?

This confluence of events forces us to confront the user’s critical question: Is the crypto market becoming a shallow pool, easily manipulated by a few large players? The evidence suggests the answer is a resounding yes.

The “shallowing pool” is a metaphor for the current state of the market. While the total market capitalization is in the trillions, making the pool appear vast and deep, the effective distribution of power and information is dangerously concentrated. The liquidity is controlled by a handful of market makers, the flow of information is captured by the well-connected, and the market’s direction can be dictated by a few hundred mega-wallets. The pool is a mile wide, but an inch deep.

The Evolution of Fear: From Hackers to Manipulators

This represents the fundamental evolution of risk in the crypto industry.

  • The Old Fear (External/Technological): For the first decade of crypto’s existence, the primary fear was protocol failure. Could Bitcoin’s 51% attack vector be exploited? Could the DAO be drained again? Could an exchange like Mt. Gox lose customer funds? These were fears centered on the integrity of the technology. The solutions were technological: stronger code, better security audits, more decentralized protocols.
  • The New Fear (Internal/Systemic): The current fear is centered on the integrity of the market. The technology can work perfectly, but the market can still be a manipulated casino. This threat comes from within. It is the fear that whales can trigger liquidation cascades at will. It is the fear that high-frequency trading firms can front-run every retail trade. And now, it is the fear that politically connected insiders can trade on non-public information with impunity.

This new fear is far more corrosive to the industry’s long-term vision. A smart contract bug can be patched. A security vulnerability can be fixed. But how do you “patch” a system against human greed and corruption? How do you decentralize access to privileged political information? The promise of crypto was to create a “trustless” system, but these events reveal that participants are still forced to trust that the game is not rigged against them from the outset. That trust is now shattered.

4: Perpetual Futures — The Engine of Manipulation

It is not enough to have privileged information; a manipulator needs a weapon. In the modern crypto market, the weapon of choice is the perpetual future, or “perp.” The fact that the whales in this saga chose to operate on Hyperliquid, a derivatives-focused DEX, is no coincidence.

Perpetual futures contracts, combined with extreme leverage (up to 100x or more), are the perfect instruments for market manipulation for several reasons:

  1. Capital Efficiency: A whale doesn’t need $500 million in capital to open a $500 million short. With 10x leverage, they only need $50 million. This allows them to exert an outsized influence on the market with a fraction of the underlying asset’s value.
  2. Fueling Liquidation Cascades: This is the most critical element. When a whale opens a massive short, it creates downward price pressure. This initial dip can be enough to trigger the liquidation of smaller, over-leveraged long positions. When these longs are liquidated, the platform is forced to market-sell their collateral, creating further downward pressure. This triggers more liquidations, which in turn create more selling pressure. The whale is not just profiting from the crash; their initial action becomes the catalyst that accelerates and amplifies the crash. They are creating the very volatility they are betting on, in a vicious feedback loop that targets and wipes out retail traders.
  3. Anonymity and Jurisdictional Arbitrage: Operating on decentralized or offshore platforms provides a layer of insulation from regulatory bodies like the SEC. It allows these massive players to operate in a legal gray area, far from the prying eyes of traditional market surveillance.

The infrastructure of the modern crypto market, built around these high-leverage instruments, has inadvertently created the perfect hunting ground for manipulators. It is a system that rewards predation and punishes the average participant. The shallow pool is filled with gasoline, and the whales hold the matches.

5: Quo Vadis, Crypto? Charting a Path Forward

The diagnosis is grim. The industry stands at a precipice, staring into an abyss of its own making. The path forward is neither simple nor clear, but to do nothing is to cede the future of digital assets to a corrupt oligarchy. If crypto is to survive and fulfill its original promise, it must confront this internal decay head-on.

1. A New Era of Radical On-Chain Forensics

The one silver lining in this story is that it was discovered. The transparent nature of the blockchain, which allowed Eye and Lookonchain to track the whales’ activities, remains crypto’s most potent defense. The industry must weaponize this transparency.

  • Invest in On-Chain Intelligence: Rather than relying on lone vigilantes, the industry should fund and professionalize on-chain analytics. Major protocols, venture funds, and community DAOs should create dedicated teams or grant programs for monitoring and exposing market manipulation. Think of it as a community-funded, decentralized SEC.
  • Develop Sophisticated Alerting Systems: Tools need to be built that can detect signs of coordinated manipulation in real-time — such as multiple large wallets opening similar positions simultaneously from a single platform — and alert the public.

2. A Moral Reckoning for Derivatives Platforms

Decentralized derivatives exchanges like Hyperliquid are at a philosophical crossroads. Their commitment to permissionless access is a core tenet of DeFi, but it has also enabled this destructive behavior. They must ask themselves if they are building financial tools or simply more efficient casinos.

Potential solutions, though controversial, must be debated:

  • Circuit Breakers: Automated trading halts during periods of extreme volatility could prevent catastrophic liquidation cascades.
  • Position Size Limits: Capping the total size of any single position could limit the ability of one actor to destabilize the entire market.
  • Responsible Leverage: Reconsidering the offering of triple-digit leverage to all users could reduce systemic risk.

3. Investor Education Focused on Survival, Not Riches

The narrative sold to retail investors must change. The promise of “getting rich quick” needs to be replaced with the sober reality of “trying not to get wiped out.” Education must focus on the dangers of the market, not just the opportunities. Topics like risk management, the dangers of leverage, and identifying market manipulation should become standard. The community must celebrate survival and sustainable growth over reckless, lottery-like bets.

4. The Inevitable Collision with Regulation

The events described are precisely the kind of scandal that invites swift and heavy-handed government intervention. Allegations of insider trading tied to the highest levels of government will force regulators to act. The industry has a choice: it can proactively self-regulate and build more robust, fair systems, or it can have a punitive regulatory framework forced upon it. The window for self-policing is closing rapidly.

Conclusion: The Battle for Crypto’s Soul

The specter haunting the crypto industry in 2025 is not a ghost in the machine, but a flaw in human nature. The battle has shifted from man vs. code to man vs. man. The promise of a decentralized and equitable financial system is being tested not by technological failure, but by the age-old corruptions of power, greed, and privileged information.

The on-chain evidence of a coordinated, insider-driven market manipulation scheme represents an existential crisis. It suggests that crypto may not be escaping the flaws of traditional finance, but merely recreating them with greater speed, opacity, and brutality. The shallowing pool is becoming the private hunting ground of a new financial elite.

The path forward demands a painful but necessary maturation. It requires a shift from a culture of naive optimism to one of healthy skepticism. It demands that we build tools not just for trading, but for justice. It forces us to acknowledge that the greatest challenge is not in writing immutable code, but in building a resilient community capable of defending itself against the most powerful and corruptible forces from within. The battle for the soul of cryptocurrency has begun, and it will be fought not on exchanges or in block times, but in the difficult arena of human ethics and collective action.

Whale Watching in a Shallowing Pool: The Specter of Manipulation in Modern Crypto was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.