Lessons from the Nile: How Ancient Egyptian OpSec Can Teach Us About Security

The parallel EVM execution layer that could redefine DeFi and gaming performance standards just launched here’s what developers need to know

The blockchain scalability wars just got more interesting. While Ethereum processes roughly 15 transactions per second and even optimistic rollups struggle to break 4,000 TPS under load, Monad has launched its mainnet claiming 10,000 TPS throughput alongside a token generation event that raised $188 million in hours.

For developers who’ve been building on congested networks and founders watching gas fees eat into user acquisition budgets, this launch represents something potentially significant: a clean-slate Layer 1 that promises EVM compatibility without the performance bottlenecks.

But beneath the headline numbers lies a more nuanced story about parallel execution, early market dynamics and whether yet another high-performance blockchain can actually attract the developer mindshare needed to matter.

The Technical Architecture: Why 10,000 TPS Actually MattersParallel Execution at the Core

Monad’s performance claims aren’t just theoretical benchmarks. The network achieves its throughput through parallel transaction execution — processing multiple non-conflicting transactions simultaneously rather than the sequential execution model that bottlenecks traditional EVMs.

Here’s what this means practically for developers:

Traditional EVM: Your DEX swap waits in line behind an NFT mint, an oracle update and fifty other unrelated transactions, even though they touch completely different state.

Monad’s approach: Non-conflicting transactions execute in parallel across multiple threads, with only truly dependent operations waiting for each other.

This isn’t a novel concept Solana pioneered parallel execution with Sealevel and Sui uses similar principles. What makes Monad interesting is achieving this while maintaining EVM bytecode compatibility. Your Solidity contracts should theoretically deploy without modification but execute with dramatically better performance.

The MonadBFT Consensus Layer

Under the hood, Monad runs a pipelined consensus mechanism called MonadBFT, a Byzantine Fault Tolerant protocol optimized for high throughput. The architecture separates consensus from execution, allowing the network to:

• Agree on transaction ordering while execution happens asynchronously
• Process blocks in under 1 second (1000ms target block time)
• Maintain finality without sacrificing decentralization assumptions

For developers, this means near-instant transaction confirmation critical for gaming applications where 12-second Ethereum block times create unacceptable UX friction.

The MON Token Launch: $188M Raise Meets Market RealityBy the Numbers

The token generation event revealed both enthusiasm and immediate market skepticism:

• Total raised: $188 million via Coinbase public sale
• Tokens sold: 7.5 billion MON at $0.025 each
• Initial trading: Dipped below $0.02 shortly after launch
• Primary pressure: Testnet airdrop recipients selling into early demand

This pricing dynamic tells a familiar story. Public sale participants entered at $0.025 with lockups, while airdrop farmers received free tokens and immediately sold. Combined with reports of high transaction fees during the launch chaos, early adopters faced a classic new-chain baptism by fire.

The Airdrop Mechanics

Monad distributed tokens to testnet users who participated in the network’s extensive testing phase. While exact allocation details vary by participation level, the airdrop strategy followed modern playbook conventions:

• Reward early builders and testers
• Distribute tokens widely to bootstrap network effects
• Accept short-term sell pressure as cost of community building

For founders evaluating whether to build on Monad, the airdrop program signals something important: the team invested in incentivizing testnet activity, which means there’s already a cohort of users familiar with the network’s quirks and performance characteristics.

The “Clean Start” Philosophy: No Legacy Baggage

Co-founder Keone Hon framed the launch around a specific value proposition: Monad starts without the accumulated technical debt and political compromises that plague older chains.

This “clean start” narrative addresses real developer pain points:

No legacy consensus debt: Unlike Ethereum’s multi-year transition from PoW to PoS, Monad shipped with its final consensus mechanism from day one.

No backward compatibility constraints: While maintaining EVM compatibility at the bytecode level, Monad isn’t constrained by Ethereum’s specific implementation decisions that made sense in 2015 but hinder performance in 2025.

No entrenched governance drama: Fresh start means new governance structures without years of accumulated political baggage.

The counterargument? Every new chain makes this exact claim. Execution matters far more than absence of history.

The Developer Ecosystem: 100+ Projects Already Building

Perhaps the most significant indicator of potential staying power: over 100 projects have already committed to launching on Monad. While many chains announce partnerships that never materialize, the breadth of categories shows strategic ecosystem development:

DeFi Infrastructure

Several DEX protocols are preparing mainnet deployments, likely attracted by the throughput needed for high-frequency trading applications that choke on Ethereum L1. The 10,000 TPS capacity theoretically enables:

• Order book exchanges with CEX-like responsiveness
• Liquidation mechanisms that execute before price moves past them
• Arbitrage bots that can actually compete on execution speed

Gaming and Consumer Apps

The 1-second block time and parallel execution create fundamentally different UX possibilities for onchain gaming. Developers building on Ethereum often resort to complex state channel architectures or accept degraded experiences. Monad’s performance envelope potentially enables:

• Real-time multiplayer game state stored onchain
• NFT minting that feels instant, not delayed
• In-game economies with transaction costs low enough for microtransactions

Early Traction Signals

Initial mainnet activity showed immediate usage across verticals:

• NFT mints executed within hours of launch, testing infrastructure under real load
• Memecoin deployment tools appeared almost instantly (a reliable indicator of retail developer interest)
• DeFi primitives began deploying, though liquidity remains nascent

This isn’t necessarily endorsement of project quality, but it demonstrates developer willingness to experiment immediately rather than wait-and-see.

The Competitive Landscape: Where Monad FitsThe High-Performance L1 Battlefield

Monad enters a crowded market of chains claiming superior performance:

Solana: The incumbent high-performance chain with 65,000 TPS theoretical capacity and actual sustained throughput around 3,000–4,000 TPS. Monad’s EVM compatibility could attract developers who prefer Solidity over Rust.

Avalanche: Modular architecture with subnet flexibility and 4,500 TPS on C-Chain. Established ecosystem but potentially more complex developer experience.

Sui/Aptos: Move-based chains with parallel execution and sub-second finality. Different programming paradigm creates switching costs.

Ethereum L2s: Arbitrum, Optimism, Base offering EVM compatibility with existing Ethereum liquidity and tooling. Lower absolute performance but significantly more battle-tested infrastructure.

Monad’s Potential Differentiation

The network’s positioning becomes clearer when viewed through developer decision frameworks:

If you’re building a DeFi protocol requiring maximum security and liquidity access → Ethereum mainnet or major L2 remains safer bet

If you’re building a consumer app hitting performance walls on existing EVMs → Monad offers familiar tooling with better performance

If you’re building experimental infrastructure and want early ecosystem positioning → Monad’s clean slate creates opportunity for outsized impact

Technical Considerations for DevelopersSmart Contract Deployment Reality Check

While Monad promises EVM compatibility, developers should expect differences:

Gas mechanics will differ: Parallel execution means gas accounting needs different models. Your optimized Ethereum contract may have different performance characteristics.

Tooling maturity lag: Hardhat, Foundry and other development tools will need time to fully support Monad-specific features. Expect rough edges.

Infrastructure gaps: Block explorers, indexing services, oracles and other middleware won’t have feature parity with Ethereum ecosystem immediately.

The Mempool Behavior Question

High-throughput chains often face mempool dynamics that differ from Ethereum:

• MEV implications: Faster blocks and parallel execution create different MEV opportunities and risks
• Transaction ordering: How does Monad handle priority fees when transactions can execute in parallel?
• Network congestion: 10,000 TPS sounds impressive until a popular NFT mint or token launch tests actual capacity

These aren’t criticisms they’re unknowns that early builders will discover through production usage.

Market Dynamics and Token EconomicsThe Token Allocation Question

While specific vesting schedules haven’t been fully detailed publicly, typical concerns apply:

• How much supply remains locked and when does it unlock?
• What percentage went to insiders versus community distribution?
• Are there programmatic incentives for liquidity providers and developers?

The immediate post-launch sell pressure tokens dropping below public sale price suggests either aggressive airdrop farming or insufficient demand at current valuation. Both scenarios have precedent in new chain launches.

Fee Market Sustainability

High fees during launch chaos created user frustration, raising questions about whether Monad’s throughput claims hold under real-world demand spikes. This matters for developers because:

Fee volatility kills user experience: Applications need predictable transaction costs to build sustainable business models.

High fees negate performance benefits: If a 10,000 TPS chain costs $5 per transaction during peak usage, it’s not actually solving the problem developers care about.

Early data remains incomplete, but monitoring fee market behavior over the first months will reveal whether architectural decisions translate to economically viable performance.

Strategic Implications for Founders and BuildersWhen to Consider Monad

Green flags for building on Monad:
You’re creating a performance-critical application (gaming, high-frequency DeFi) where existing chains demonstrably bottleneck your product vision. You have runway to weather early ecosystem instability and can contribute to infrastructure gaps rather than just consume existing tooling. You see strategic value in early positioning within a new ecosystem where you can capture outsized mindshare.

Red flags suggesting caution:
Your application primarily needs liquidity access and composability with existing DeFi protocols (stick to Ethereum mainnet or major L2s). You require mature infrastructure and can’t afford production bugs from bleeding-edge blockchain software. Your user base expects battle-tested security guarantees that only come from years of adversarial testing.

The Multichain Strategy Question

Rather than viewing Monad as replacement for Ethereum, sophisticated teams will likely treat it as part of a deployment strategy:

• Deploy core protocol logic on Ethereum L1 or established L2 for security and liquidity
• Launch performance-critical components or consumer-facing experiences on Monad
• Use cross-chain messaging to connect liquidity and state where needed

This hedged approach acknowledges that no single chain will dominate every use case.

What Happens Next: The Critical 6-Month Window

New blockchain launches succeed or fail based on what happens in the first six months post-mainnet. History provides clear patterns:

Success indicators to watch:
Deployment of at least 2–3 applications with genuine user retention (not just mercenary farmers). Development of native DeFi primitives that attract real liquidity, not just token incentives. Emergence of infrastructure projects (indexers, oracles, wallets) built by teams staying for long-term ecosystem development. Evidence that claimed 10,000 TPS performs under adversarial conditions and spam attacks.

Warning signs that suggest trouble:
Developer activity concentrated only in memecoin deployment without substantive applications. Token price decline causing treasury runway concerns and reduced ecosystem grants. Infrastructure gaps remaining unfilled as teams move to next shiny object. Network performance degrading under real usage, revealing gap between testnet benchmarks and mainnet reality.

The Bigger Picture: Do We Need Another L1?

This question matters more than Monad specifically. The blockchain landscape already fragments attention and liquidity across dozens of chains. Does adding another high-performance EVM create value or just dilute ecosystem effects?

The Optimistic Case

Competition drives innovation. Ethereum’s dominance has led to complacency on performance improvements. New chains force incumbents to improve and give developers alternatives when architectural decisions create bottlenecks. Parallel execution at EVM level could influence Ethereum’s own roadmap. Different chains optimize for different use cases monoculture is fragile.

The Skeptical View

Developer attention and user liquidity are zero-sum in the short term. Most “Ethereum killers” end up as ghost towns after initial hype fades. EVM compatibility without Ethereum’s network effects often means worse tradeoffs. We already have Solana for performance and L2s for EVM compatibility what problem specifically needs Monad?

The honest answer? Time will tell based on whether developers build things people actually use.

Key Takeaways for Technical Audiences

For blockchain developers: Monad offers familiar Solidity environment with meaningfully better performance ceiling. Worth experimenting with testnet deployment to understand parallel execution implications before committing production applications.

For DeFi founders: Evaluate whether your protocol’s bottleneck is actually blockchain performance or liquidity/users. If genuinely performance-constrained, Monad’s architecture addresses real pain points, but ecosystem immaturity creates other risks.

For infrastructure builders: Early positioning in new ecosystem creates opportunity to become default solution in category. Risk of building for ecosystem that fails to achieve critical mass.

For investors and researchers: Launching with working mainnet, actual TPS capacity, and 100+ committed projects is significant relative to typical vaporware announcements. Token performance and fee market behavior over next 6 months will reveal whether technical architecture translates to sustainable economic model.

Conclusion: Potential, Not Certainty

Monad’s mainnet launch represents serious technical execution — shipping a working high-performance EVM with parallel execution and sub-second finality is nontrivial. The $188 million raise and 100+ committed projects suggest meaningful ecosystem investment.

But blockchain history is littered with impressive technical launches that failed to achieve lasting developer adoption. Throughput benchmarks matter far less than whether teams build applications people choose to use. The “clean start” narrative is compelling but doesn’t guarantee success execution over the next year will determine whether Monad becomes a meaningful platform or a footnote in blockchain history.

For developers and founders evaluating whether to build on Monad, the calculus comes down to: Does your specific application genuinely need performance characteristics that existing chains can’t deliver? Are you positioned to weather early ecosystem instability? Can you contribute to infrastructure gaps rather than just consume existing tooling?

If answers are yes, Monad’s launch creates a strategic opportunity. If not, waiting for ecosystem maturity remains the rational choice.

The next six months will reveal whether 10,000 TPS and EVM compatibility represent a genuinely differentiated platform or just another impressive technical demo.

What’s your take? Are you building on Monad or watching from the sidelines? Share your technical considerations in the comments below.

Follow for ongoing coverage of blockchain infrastructure, DeFi primitives and developer ecosystem dynamics across Layer 1 and Layer 2 networks.

Monad Mainnet Goes Live: Inside the 10,000 TPS Blockchain That Just Raised $188M was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.